Do you would imagine it is better for students to your workplace before their university study?

MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, better to write, simpler to read.

PARAGRAPH 1 experience that is practical contacts, on the job skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..

PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and private sector, helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students will alter their advanced schooling course while at uni….

Many individuals believe that it’s safer to learn something in a combined group rather than individually. Can you agree or disagree?

Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise

Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not determined by others
More mature way, more responsible
No laggards

Topic and Answer: Education (child)

Some individuals think that children needs to do organised activities within their time that is free while think that children should always be absolve to do what they want to complete inside their free time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your answer.

PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting the mind wonder, children can go to town, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent studies show 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it could be unfair for this minority.

PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to buy
-furthermore studies show that the mind operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.

Topic and Answer: Globalisation

Many people say that globalisation in addition to growing quantity of multinational companies have a negative impact on the environment. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. To what extent can you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to aid your position.

PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENT
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop of the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these may have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP Gulf of Mexico, oil spill, destroyed the local ecosystem…

Scientists think that to be able to protect the surroundings, people must use less energy inside their daily lives. However, a lot of people never have changed the real way they live. Why do you might think many individuals have not taken individual action? What could be done to cause them to become take action?

Ideas for body paragraph 1

Not taken action that is individual:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy for the commons
– Collective problem – better to shirk responsibility

Ideas for body paragraph 2

What might be done to encourage them to take action?
– Media campaigns by the federal government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……

Some believe that customwritings could be the responsibility of people to take care of environmental surroundings. Others say it is the national government which should be careful of the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Paragraph 1
People should care for the surroundings because:
We are the consumers, we vote with this wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)

Paragraph 2
Government should take care of the environmental surroundings because:
They usually have the charged capacity to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
Supposed to be guardians regarding the country, which means that collectively they are guardians of this earth… yet not true the truth is

Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!

In many countries small shops and town centers are getting out of business, because people have a tendency to drive into the large stores that are out-of-town. This leads to an increase in car use, and it also means that people without cars don’t have a lot of usage of out-of-town stores. You think features of such development outweigh its disadvantages?

Leave a Reply

*

Contact Editura Cartea Creștină

Str. Cuza Vodă, Nr. 85, Oradea

info@ecc.ro0259-436-7380259-436-152

Program Librărie

  • Monday: 8:00 - 16:00
  • Tuesday: 8:00 - 16:00
  • Wednesday: 8:00 - 16:00
  • Thursday: 8:00 - 16:00
  • Friday: 8:00 - 16:00
  • Saturday: -
  • Sunday: -